Instrument approach: Difference between revisions

From AviationSafetyX Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
There are three categories of instrument approach procedures: '''precision approach''' (PA), '''approach with vertical guidance''' (APV), and '''non-precision approach''' (NPA). A precision approach uses a navigation system that provides course and [[glidepath]] guidance. Examples include [[precision approach radar]] (PAR), [[instrument landing system]] (ILS), and [[Local Area Augmentation System|GBAS landing system]] (GLS). An approach with vertical guidance also uses a navigation system for course and glidepath deviation, just not to the same standards as a PA. Examples include [[VNAV|baro-VNAV]], [[localizer type directional aid]] (LDA) with glidepath, [[LNAV]]/VNAV and [[localizer performance with vertical guidance|LPV]]. A non-precision approach uses a navigation system for course deviation but does not provide glidepath information. These approaches include [[VHF omnidirectional range|VOR]], [[non-directional beacon|NDB]], LP (Localizer Performance), and LNAV. PAs and APVs are flown to a decision height/altitude (DH/DA), while non-precision approaches are flown to a minimum descent altitude (MDA).<ref name=AIM/>{{rp|757}}<ref>{{cite web |title=Satellite Navigation - NAS Implementation NAS Implementation - Procedures - Localizer Performance (LP) |url=https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/techops/navservices/gnss/nas/procedures/lp#:~:text=Localizer%20Performance%20(%20LP%20)%20approaches%20are,of%20vertically%2Dguided%20LPV%20procedures. |website=FAA |publisher=US Department of Transportation |access-date=7 November 2022}}</ref>
There are three categories of instrument approach procedures: '''precision approach''' (PA), '''approach with vertical guidance''' (APV), and '''non-precision approach''' (NPA). A precision approach uses a navigation system that provides course and [[glidepath]] guidance. Examples include [[precision approach radar]] (PAR), [[instrument landing system]] (ILS), and [[Local Area Augmentation System|GBAS landing system]] (GLS). An approach with vertical guidance also uses a navigation system for course and glidepath deviation, just not to the same standards as a PA. Examples include [[VNAV|baro-VNAV]], [[localizer type directional aid]] (LDA) with glidepath, [[LNAV]]/VNAV and [[localizer performance with vertical guidance|LPV]]. A non-precision approach uses a navigation system for course deviation but does not provide glidepath information. These approaches include [[VHF omnidirectional range|VOR]], [[non-directional beacon|NDB]], LP (Localizer Performance), and LNAV. PAs and APVs are flown to a decision height/altitude (DH/DA), while non-precision approaches are flown to a minimum descent altitude (MDA).<ref name=AIM/>{{rp|757}}<ref>{{cite web |title=Satellite Navigation - NAS Implementation NAS Implementation - Procedures - Localizer Performance (LP) |url=https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/techops/navservices/gnss/nas/procedures/lp#:~:text=Localizer%20Performance%20(%20LP%20)%20approaches%20are,of%20vertically%2Dguided%20LPV%20procedures. |website=FAA |publisher=US Department of Transportation |access-date=7 November 2022}}</ref>


'''IAP charts''' are [[aeronautical chart]]s that portray the aeronautical data that is required to execute an instrument approach to an airport. Besides depicting topographic features, hazards and obstructions, they depict the procedures and airport diagram. Each procedure chart uses a specific type of electronic navigation system such as an NDB, [[TACAN]], VOR, ILS/[[microwave landing system|MLS]] and [[RNAV]].<ref name=AIM/>{{rp|981–982}}
'''IAP charts''' are [[aeronautical chart]]s that portray the aeronautical data that is required to execute an instrument approach to an airport. Besides depicting topographic features, hazards and obstructions, they depict the procedures and airport diagram. Each procedure chart uses a specific type of electronic navigation system such as an NDB, [[TACAN]], VOR, ILS/[[microwave landing system|MLS]] and [[RNAV]].<ref name=AIM/>{{rp|981–982}} The chart name reflects the primary [[navigational aid]] (NAVAID), if there is more than one straight-in procedure or if it is just a circling-only procedure. A communication strip on the chart lists frequencies in the order they are used. Minimum, maximum and mandatory altitudes are depicted in addition to the minimum safe altitude (MSA) for emergencies. A cross depicts the final approach fix (FAF) altitude on NPAs while a lightning bolt does the same for PAs. NPAs depict the MDA while a PA shows both the decision altitude (DA) and decision height (DH). Finally, the chart depicts the [[missed approach]] procedures in plan and profile view, besides listing the steps in sequence.<ref name=IPH-2015>{{cite book |title=Instrument Procedures Handbook, FAA-H-8083-16A |url=https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/instrument_procedures_handbook/ |publisher=[[Federal Aviation Administration]] |year=2015}}</ref>{{rp|4-9,4-11,4-19,4-20,4-41}}


<!-- Truncated due to character limit -->
<!-- remaining content continues unchanged -->

Revision as of 12:27, 31 March 2025

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/ambox.css"></templatestyles>

An "approach plate" depicting an instrument approach procedure for an ILS approach to Tacoma Narrows Airport in the United States

In aviation, an instrument approach or instrument approach procedure (IAP) is a series of predetermined maneuvers for the orderly transfer of an aircraft operating under instrument flight rules from the beginning of the initial approach to a landing, or to a point from which a landing may be made visually.[1] These approaches are approved in the European Union by EASA and the respective country authorities and in the United States by the FAA or the United States Department of Defense for the military. The ICAO defines an instrument approach as "a series of predetermined maneuvers by reference to flight instruments with specific protection from obstacles from the initial approach fix, or where applicable, from the beginning of a defined arrival route to a point from which a landing can be completed and thereafter, if landing is not completed, to a position at which holding or en route obstacle clearance criteria apply."[2]

There are three categories of instrument approach procedures: precision approach (PA), approach with vertical guidance (APV), and non-precision approach (NPA). A precision approach uses a navigation system that provides course and glidepath guidance. Examples include precision approach radar (PAR), instrument landing system (ILS), and GBAS landing system (GLS). An approach with vertical guidance also uses a navigation system for course and glidepath deviation, just not to the same standards as a PA. Examples include baro-VNAV, localizer type directional aid (LDA) with glidepath, LNAV/VNAV and LPV. A non-precision approach uses a navigation system for course deviation but does not provide glidepath information. These approaches include VOR, NDB, LP (Localizer Performance), and LNAV. PAs and APVs are flown to a decision height/altitude (DH/DA), while non-precision approaches are flown to a minimum descent altitude (MDA).[2]: 757 [3]

IAP charts are aeronautical charts that portray the aeronautical data that is required to execute an instrument approach to an airport. Besides depicting topographic features, hazards and obstructions, they depict the procedures and airport diagram. Each procedure chart uses a specific type of electronic navigation system such as an NDB, TACAN, VOR, ILS/MLS and RNAV.[2]: 981–982  The chart name reflects the primary navigational aid (NAVAID), if there is more than one straight-in procedure or if it is just a circling-only procedure. A communication strip on the chart lists frequencies in the order they are used. Minimum, maximum and mandatory altitudes are depicted in addition to the minimum safe altitude (MSA) for emergencies. A cross depicts the final approach fix (FAF) altitude on NPAs while a lightning bolt does the same for PAs. NPAs depict the MDA while a PA shows both the decision altitude (DA) and decision height (DH). Finally, the chart depicts the missed approach procedures in plan and profile view, besides listing the steps in sequence.[4]: 4–9, 4–11, 4–19, 4–20, 4–41 


  1. Jump up to: 2.0 2.1 2.2
  2. Satellite Navigation - NAS Implementation NAS Implementation - Procedures - Localizer Performance (LP).  US Department of Transportation.  Retrieved 7 November 2022 from FAA