This is a good article. Click here for more information.

Jet stream

From AviationSafetyX Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

The polar jet stream can travel at speeds greater than 180 km/h (110 mph). Here, the fastest winds are coloured red; slower winds are blue.
Clouds along a jet stream over Canada.

Template:Weather

Jet streams are fast flowing, narrow air currents in the Earth's atmosphere.[1]

The main jet streams are located near the altitude of the tropopause and are westerly winds, flowing west to east around the globe. The northern hemisphere and the southern hemisphere each have a polar jet around their respective polar vortex at around 30,000 ft (5.7 mi; 9.1 km) above sea level and typically travelling at around 110 mph (180 km/h) although often considerably faster.[2] Closer to the equator and somewhat higher and somewhat weaker is a subtropical jet.[2]

The northern polar jet flows over the middle to northern latitudes of North America, Europe, and Asia and their intervening oceans, while the southern hemisphere polar jet mostly circles Antarctica.[3] Jet streams may start, stop, split into two or more parts, combine into one stream, or flow in various directions including opposite to the direction of the remainder of the jet.[4]

The El Niño–Southern Oscillation affects the location of the jet streams, which in turn affects the weather over the tropical Pacific Ocean and affects the climate of much of the tropics and subtropics, and can affect weather in higher-latitude regions. The term "jet stream" is also applied to some other winds at varying levels in the atmosphere, some global (such as the higher-level polar-night jet), some local (such as the African easterly jet). Meteorologists use the location of some of the jet streams as an aid in weather forecasting. Airlines use them to reduce some flight times and fuel consumption. Scientists have considered whether the jet streams might be harnessed for power generation. In World War II, the Japanese used the jet stream to carry Fu-Go balloon bombs across the Pacific Ocean to launch small attacks on North America.

Jet streams have been detected in the atmospheres of Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.[5]

Discovery

The first indications of this phenomenon came from American professor Elias Loomis (1811–1889), when he proposed the hypothesis of a powerful air current in the upper air blowing west to east across the United States as an explanation for the behaviour of major storms.[6] After the 1883 eruption of the Krakatoa volcano, weather watchers tracked and mapped the effects on the sky over several years. They labelled the phenomenon the "equatorial smoke stream".[7][8] In the 1920s Japanese meteorologist Wasaburo Oishi detected the jet stream from a site near Mount Fuji.[9][10] He tracked pilot balloons ("pibals"), used to measure wind speed and direction,[11] as they rose in the air. Oishi's work largely went unnoticed outside Japan because it was published in Esperanto, though chronologically he has to be credited for the scientific discovery of jet streams. American pilot Wiley Post (1898–1935), the first man to fly around the world solo in 1933, is often given some credit for discovery of jet streams. Post invented a pressurized suit that let him fly above 6,200 metres (20,300 ft). In the year before his death, Post made several attempts at a high-altitude transcontinental flight, and noticed that at times his ground speed greatly exceeded his air speed.[12]

German meteorologist Heinrich Seilkopf is credited with coining a special term, Strahlströmung (literally "jet current"), for the phenomenon in 1939.[13][14] Many sources credit real understanding of the nature of jet streams to regular and repeated flight-path traversals during World War II. Flyers consistently noticed westerly tailwinds in excess of 160 km/h (100 mph) in flights, for example, from the US to the UK.[15] Similarly in 1944 a team of American meteorologists in Guam, including Reid Bryson, had enough observations to forecast very high west winds that would slow bombers raiding Japan.[16]

Description

General configuration of the polar and subtropical jet streams
Cross section of the subtropical and polar jet streams by latitude

The polar and subtropical jet streams are the product of two factors: the atmospheric heating by solar radiation that produces the large-scale polar, Ferrel, and Hadley circulation cells, and the action of the Coriolis force acting on those moving masses. The Coriolis force is caused by the planet's rotation on its axis. The polar jet stream forms near the interface of the polar and Ferrel circulation cells; the subtropical jet forms near the boundary of the Ferrel and Hadley circulation cells.[17]

Polar jet streams are typically located near the 250 hPa (about 1/4 atmosphere) pressure level, or 30,000 ft (5.7 mi; 9.1 km) above sea level while the weaker subtropical jet streams are somewhat higher.[18][2]

The polar jets, at lower altitude, and often intruding into mid-latitudes, strongly affect weather and aviation.[19][20] The polar jet stream is most commonly found between latitudes 30° and 60° (closer to 60°), while the subtropical jet streams are located close to latitude 30°. These two jets merge at some locations and times, while at other times they are well separated. The northern polar jet stream is said to "follow the sun" as it slowly migrates northward as that hemisphere warms, and southward again as it cools.[21][22]

The width of a jet stream is typically a few hundred kilometres or miles and its vertical thickness often less than five kilometres (16,000 feet).[23]

Jet streams are typically continuous over long distances, but discontinuities are also common.[24] The path of the jet typically has a meandering shape, and these meanders themselves propagate eastward, at lower speeds than that of the actual wind within the flow. Further, the meanders can split or form eddies.[25]

Each large meander, or wave, within the jet stream is known as a Rossby wave (planetary wave). Rossby waves are caused by changes in the Coriolis effect with latitude.[26] Shortwave troughs, are smaller scale waves superimposed on the Rossby waves, with a scale of 1,000 to 4,000 kilometres (600–2,500 mi) long,[27] that move along through the flow pattern around large scale, or longwave, "ridges" and "troughs" within Rossby waves.[28]

The wind speeds are greatest where temperature differences between air masses are greatest, and often exceed 92 km/h (50 kn; 57 mph).[24] Speeds of 400 km/h (220 kn; 250 mph) have been measured.[29]

The jet stream moves from west to east bringing changes of weather.[30] The path of jet streams affects cyclonic storm systems at lower levels in the atmosphere, and so knowledge of their course has become an important part of weather forecasting. For example, in 2007 and 2012, Britain experienced severe flooding as a result of the polar jet staying south for the summer.[31][32][33]

Cause

Highly idealised depiction of the global circulation. The upper-level jets tend to flow latitudinally along the cell boundaries.


In general, winds are strongest immediately under the tropopause (except locally, during tornadoes, tropical cyclones or other anomalous situations). If two air masses of different temperatures or densities meet, the resulting pressure difference caused by the density difference (which ultimately causes wind) is highest within the transition zone. The wind does not flow directly from the hot to the cold area, but is deflected by the Coriolis effect and flows along the boundary of the two air masses.[34]

All these facts are consequences of the thermal wind relation. The balance of forces acting on an atmospheric air parcel in the vertical direction is primarily between the gravitational force acting on the mass of the parcel and the buoyancy force, or the difference in pressure between the top and bottom surfaces of the parcel. Any imbalance between these forces results in the acceleration of the parcel in the imbalance direction: upward if the buoyant force exceeds the weight, and downward if the weight exceeds the buoyancy force. The balance in the vertical direction is referred to as hydrostatic. Beyond the tropics, the dominant forces act in the horizontal direction, and the primary struggle is between the Coriolis force and the pressure gradient force. Balance between these two forces is referred to as geostrophic. Given both hydrostatic and geostrophic balance, one can derive the thermal wind relation: the vertical gradient of the horizontal wind is proportional to the horizontal temperature gradient. If two air masses in the northern hemisphere, one cold and dense to the north and the other hot and less dense to the south, are separated by a vertical boundary and that boundary should be removed, the difference in densities will result in the cold air mass slipping under the hotter and less dense air mass. The Coriolis effect will then cause poleward-moving mass to deviate to the East, while equatorward-moving mass will deviate toward the west. The general trend in the atmosphere is for temperatures to decrease in the poleward direction. As a result, winds develop an eastward component and that component grows with altitude. Therefore, the strong eastward moving jet streams are in part a simple consequence of the fact that the Equator is warmer than the north and south poles.[34]

Polar jet stream

The thermal wind relation does not explain why the winds are organized into tight jets, rather than distributed more broadly over the hemisphere. One factor that contributes to the creation of a concentrated polar jet is the undercutting of sub-tropical air masses by the more dense polar air masses at the polar front. This causes a sharp north–south pressure (south–north potential vorticity) gradient in the horizontal plane, an effect which is most significant during double Rossby wave breaking events.[35] At high altitudes, lack of friction allows air to respond freely to the steep pressure gradient with low pressure at high altitude over the pole. This results in the formation of planetary wind circulations that experience a strong Coriolis deflection and thus can be considered 'quasi-geostrophic'. The polar front jet stream is closely linked to the frontogenesis process in midlatitudes, as the acceleration/deceleration of the air flow induces areas of low/high pressure respectively, which link to the formation of cyclones and anticyclones along the polar front in a relatively narrow region.[24]

Subtropical jet

A second factor which contributes to a concentrated jet is more applicable to the subtropical jet which forms at the poleward limit of the tropical Hadley cell, and to first order this circulation is symmetric with respect to longitude. Tropical air rises to the tropopause, and moves poleward before sinking; this is the Hadley cell circulation. As it does so it tends to conserve angular momentum, since friction with the ground is slight. Air masses that begin moving poleward are deflected eastward by the Coriolis force (true for either hemisphere), which for poleward moving air implies an increased westerly component of the winds[36]

Effects

Hurricane protection

Hurricane Flossie over Hawaii in 2007. Note the large band of moisture that developed East of Hawaii Island that came from the hurricane.

The subtropical jet stream rounding the base of the mid-oceanic upper trough is thought[37] to be one of the causes most of the Hawaiian Islands have been resistant to the long list of Hawaii hurricanes that have approached. For example, when Hurricane Flossie (2007) approached and dissipated just before reaching landfall, the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) cited vertical wind shear as evidenced in the photo.[37]

Uses

The northern polar jet stream is the most important one for aviation and weather forecasting, as it is much stronger and at a much lower altitude than the subtropical jet streams and also covers many countries in the northern hemisphere,[38] while the southern polar jet stream mostly circles Antarctica and sometimes the southern tip of South America.[39]

Aviation

Flights between Tokyo and Los Angeles using the jet stream eastbound and a great circle route westbound.

The location of the jet stream is important for aviation. Aircraft flight time can be dramatically affected by either flying with the flow or against it. Often, airlines work to fly with the jet stream to obtain significant fuel cost and time savings.[38][40]

Commercial use of the jet stream began on 18 November 1952, when Pan Am flew from Tokyo to Honolulu at an altitude of 7,600 metres (24,900 ft). It cut the trip time by over one-third, from 18 to 11.5 hours.[41]

Within North America, the time needed to fly east across the continent can be decreased by about 30 minutes if an airplane can fly with the jet stream.[42] Across the Atlantic Ocean the North Atlantic Tracks service allows airlines and air traffic control to accommodate the jet stream for the benefit for airlines and other users.[43]

Associated with jet streams is a phenomenon known as clear-air turbulence (CAT), caused by vertical and horizontal wind shear caused by jet streams.[44] The CAT is strongest on the cold air side of the jet,[45] next to and just under the axis of the jet.[46] Clear-air turbulence can cause aircraft to plunge and so present a passenger safety hazard that has caused fatal accidents, such as the death of one passenger on United Airlines Flight 826 in 1997.[47][48] Unusual wind speed in the jet stream in late February 2024 pushed commercial jets to excess of 800 mph (1,300 km/h; 700 kn) relative to the ground.[49][50]

Possible future power generation

Scientists are investigating ways to harness the wind energy within the jet stream. According to one estimate of the potential wind energy in the jet stream, only one percent would be needed to meet the world's current energy needs. In the late 2000s it was estimated that the required technology would reportedly take 10–20 years to develop.[51] There are two major but divergent scientific articles about jet stream power. Archer & Caldeira[52] claim that the Earth's jet streams could generate a total power of 1700 terawatts (TW) and that the climatic impact of harnessing this amount would be negligible. However, Miller, Gans, & Kleidon[53] claim that the jet streams could generate a total power of only 7.5 TW and lacks the potential to make a significant contribution to renewable energy.[53]

Unpowered aerial attack

Near the end of World War II, from late 1944 until early 1945, the Japanese Fu-Go balloon bomb, a type of fire balloon, was designed as a cheap weapon intended to make use of the jet stream over the Pacific Ocean to reach the west coast of Canada and the United States. Relatively ineffective as weapons, they were used in one of the few attacks on North America during World War II, causing six deaths and a small amount of damage.[54] American scientists studying the balloons thought the Japanese might be preparing a biological attack.[55]

Changes due to climate cycles

Effects of ENSO

Impact of El Niño and La Niña on North America

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) influences the average location of upper-level jet streams, and leads to cyclical variations in precipitation and temperature across North America, as well as affecting tropical cyclone development across the eastern Pacific and Atlantic basins. Combined with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, ENSO can also impact cold season rainfall in Europe.[56] Changes in ENSO also change the location of the jet stream over South America, which partially affects precipitation distribution over the continent.[57]

El Niño

During El Niño events, increased precipitation is expected in California due to a more southerly, zonal, storm track.[58] During the Niño portion of ENSO, increased precipitation falls along the Gulf coast and Southeast due to a stronger than normal, and more southerly, polar jet stream.[59] Snowfall is greater than average across the southern Rockies and Sierra Nevada mountain range, and is well below normal across the Upper Midwest and Great Lakes states.[60] The northern tier of the lower 48 exhibits above normal temperatures during the fall and winter, while the Gulf coast experiences below normal temperatures during the winter season.[61][62] The subtropical jet stream across the deep tropics of the northern hemisphere is enhanced due to increased convection in the equatorial Pacific, which decreases tropical cyclogenesis within the Atlantic tropics below what is normal, and increases tropical cyclone activity across the eastern Pacific.[63] In the southern hemisphere, the subtropical jet stream is displaced equatorward, or north, of its normal position, which diverts frontal systems and thunderstorm complexes from reaching central portions of the continent.[57]

La Niña

Across North America during La Niña, increased precipitation is diverted into the Pacific Northwest due to a more northerly storm track and jet stream.[64] The storm track shifts far enough northward to bring wetter than normal conditions (in the form of increased snowfall) to the Midwestern states, as well as hot and dry summers.[65][66] Snowfall is above normal across the Pacific Northwest and western Great Lakes.[60] Across the North Atlantic, the jet stream is stronger than normal, which directs stronger systems with increased precipitation towards Europe.[67]

Dust Bowl

Evidence suggests the jet stream was at least partly responsible for the widespread drought conditions during the 1930s Dust Bowl in the Midwest United States. Normally, the jet stream flows east over the Gulf of Mexico and turns northward pulling up moisture and dumping rain onto the Great Plains. During the Dust Bowl, the jet stream weakened and changed course traveling farther south than normal. This starved the Great Plains and other areas of the Midwest of rainfall, causing extraordinary drought conditions.[68]

Longer-term climatic changes

Meanders (Rossby waves) of the northern hemisphere's polar jet stream developing (a), (b); then finally detaching a "drop" of cold air (c). Orange: warmer masses of air; pink: jet stream.

Since the early 2000s, climate models have consistently identified that global warming will gradually push jet streams poleward. In 2008, this was confirmed by observational evidence, which proved that from 1979 to 2001, the northern jet stream moved northward at an average rate of 2.01 kilometres (1.25 mi) per year, with a similar trend in the southern hemisphere jet stream.[69][70] Climate scientists have hypothesized that the jet stream will also gradually weaken as a result of global warming. Trends such as Arctic sea ice decline, reduced snow cover, evapotranspiration patterns, and other weather anomalies have caused the Arctic to heat up faster than other parts of the globe, in what is known as the Arctic amplification. In 2021–2022, it was found that since 1979, the warming within the Arctic Circle has been nearly four times faster than the global average,[71][72] and some hotspots in the Barents Sea area warmed up to seven times faster than the global average.[73][74] While the Arctic remains one of the coldest places on Earth today, the temperature gradient between it and the warmer parts of the globe will continue to diminish with every decade of global warming as the result of this amplification. If this gradient has a strong influence on the jet stream, then it will eventually become weaker and more variable in its course, which would allow more cold air from the polar vortex to leak mid-latitudes and slow the progression of Rossby waves, leading to more persistent and more extreme weather.[75]

The hypothesis above is closely associated with Jennifer Francis, who had first proposed it in a 2012 paper co-authored by Stephen J. Vavrus.[75] While some paleoclimate reconstructions have suggested that the polar vortex becomes more variable and causes more unstable weather during periods of warming back in 1997,[76] this was contradicted by climate modelling, with PMIP2 simulations finding in 2010 that the Arctic Oscillation (AO) was much weaker and more negative during the Last Glacial Maximum, and suggesting that warmer periods have stronger positive phase AO, and thus less frequent leaks of the polar vortex air.[77] However, a 2012 review in the Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences noted that "there [has been] a significant change in the vortex mean state over the twenty-first century, resulting in a weaker, more disturbed vortex.",[78] which contradicted the modelling results but fit the Francis-Vavrus hypothesis. Additionally, a 2013 study noted that the then-current CMIP5 tended to strongly underestimate winter blocking trends,[79] and other 2012 research had suggested a connection between declining Arctic sea ice and heavy snowfall during midlatitude winters.[80]

In 2013, further research from Francis connected reductions in the Arctic sea ice to extreme summer weather in the northern mid-latitudes,[81] while other research from that year identified potential linkages between Arctic sea ice trends and more extreme rainfall in the European summer.[82] At the time, it was also suggested that this connection between Arctic amplification and jet stream patterns was involved in the formation of Hurricane Sandy[83] and played a role in the early 2014 North American cold wave.[84][85] In 2015, Francis' next study concluded that highly amplified jet-stream patterns are occurring more frequently in the past two decades. Hence, continued heat-trapping emissions favour increased formation of extreme events caused by prolonged weather conditions.[86]

Studies published in 2017 and 2018 identified stalling patterns of Rossby waves in the northern hemisphere jet stream as the culprit behind other almost stationary extreme weather events, such as the 2018 European heatwave, the 2003 European heat wave, 2010 Russian heat wave or the 2010 Pakistan floods, and suggested that these patterns were all connected to Arctic amplification.[87][88] Further work from Francis and Vavrus that year suggested that amplified Arctic warming is observed as stronger in lower atmospheric areas because the expanding process of warmer air increases pressure levels which decreases poleward geopotential height gradients. As these gradients are the reason that cause west to east winds through the thermal wind relationship, declining speeds are usually found south of the areas with geopotential increases.[89] In 2017, Francis explained her findings to the Scientific American: "A lot more water vapor is being transported northward by big swings in the jet stream. That's important because water vapor is a greenhouse gas just like carbon dioxide and methane. It traps heat in the atmosphere. That vapor also condenses as droplets we know as clouds, which themselves trap more heat. The vapor is a big part of the amplification story—a big reason the Arctic is warming faster than anywhere else."[90]

In a 2017 study conducted by climatologist Judah Cohen and several of his research associates, Cohen wrote that "[the] shift in polar vortex states can account for most of the recent winter cooling trends over Eurasian midlatitudes".[91] A 2018 paper from Vavrus and others linked Arctic amplification to more persistent hot-dry extremes during the midlatitude summers, as well as the midlatitude winter continental cooling.[92] Another 2017 paper estimated that when the Arctic experiences anomalous warming, primary production in North America goes down by between 1% and 4% on average, with some states suffering up to 20% losses.[93] A 2021 study found that a stratospheric polar vortex disruption is linked with extreme cold winter weather across parts of Asia and North America, including the February 2021 North American cold wave.[94][95] Another 2021 study identified a connection between the Arctic sea ice loss and the increased size of wildfires in the Western United States.[96]

However, because the specific observations are considered short-term observations, there is considerable uncertainty in the conclusions. Climatology observations require several decades to definitively distinguish various forms of natural variability from climate trends.[97] This point was stressed by reviews in 2013[98] and in 2017.[99] A study in 2014 concluded that Arctic amplification significantly decreased cold-season temperature variability over the northern hemisphere in recent decades. Cold Arctic air intrudes into the warmer lower latitudes more rapidly today during autumn and winter, a trend projected to continue in the future except during summer, thus calling into question whether winters will bring more cold extremes.[100] A 2019 analysis of a data set collected from 35 182 weather stations worldwide, including 9116 whose records go beyond 50 years, found a sharp decrease in northern midlatitude cold waves since the 1980s.[101]

Moreover, a range of long-term observational data collected during the 2010s and published in 2020 suggests that the intensification of Arctic amplification since the early 2010s was not linked to significant changes on mid-latitude atmospheric patterns.[102][103] State-of-the-art modelling research of PAMIP (Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project) improved upon the 2010 findings of PMIP2; it found that sea ice decline would weaken the jet stream and increase the probability of atmospheric blocking, but the connection was very minor, and typically insignificant next to interannual variability.[104][105] In 2022, a follow-up study found that while the PAMIP average had likely underestimated the weakening caused by sea ice decline by 1.2 to 3 times, even the corrected connection still amounts to only 10% of the jet stream's natural variability.[106]

Additionally, a 2021 study found that while jet streams had indeed slowly moved polewards since 1960 as was predicted by models, they did not weaken, in spite of a small increase in waviness.[107] A 2022 re-analysis of the aircraft observational data collected over 2002–2020 suggested that the North Atlantic jet stream had actually strengthened.[108] Finally, a 2021 study was able to reconstruct jet stream patterns over the past 1,250 years based on Greenland ice cores, and found that all of the recently observed changes remain within range of natural variability: the earliest likely time of divergence is in 2060, under the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 which implies continually accelerating greenhouse gas emissions.[109]

Other upper-level jets

Polar night jet

The polar-night jet stream forms mainly during the winter months when the nights are much longer – hence the name referencing polar nights – in their respective hemispheres at around 60° latitude. The polar night jet moves at a greater height (about 24,000 metres (80,000 ft)) than it does during the summer.[110] During these dark months the air high over the poles becomes much colder than the air over the Equator. This difference in temperature gives rise to extreme air pressure differences in the stratosphere which, when combined with the Coriolis effect, create the polar night jets, that race eastward at an altitude of about 48 kilometres (30 mi).[111] The polar vortex is circled by the polar night jet. The warmer air can only move along the edge of the polar vortex, but not enter it. Within the vortex, the cold polar air becomes increasingly cold, due to a lack of warmer air from lower latitudes as well as a lack of energy from the Sun entering during the polar night.[112]

Low-level jets

There are wind maxima at lower levels of the atmosphere that are also referred to as jets.

Barrier jet

A barrier jet in the low levels forms just upstream of mountain chains, with the mountains forcing the jet to be oriented parallel to the mountains. The mountain barrier increases the strength of the low level wind by 45 percent.[113] In the North American Great Plains a southerly low-level jet helps fuel overnight thunderstorm activity during the warm season, normally in the form of mesoscale convective systems which form during the overnight hours.[114] A similar phenomenon develops across Australia, which pulls moisture poleward from the Coral Sea towards cut-off lows which form mainly across southwestern portions of the continent.[115]

Coastal jet

Coastal low-level jets are related to a sharp contrast between high temperatures over land and lower temperatures over the sea and play an important role in coastal weather, giving rise to strong coast parallel winds.[116] Most coastal jets are associated with the oceanic high-pressure systems and thermal low over land and are mainly located along cold eastern boundary marine currents, in upwelling regions offshore California, Peru–Chile, Benguela, Portugal, Canary and West Australia, and offshore Yemen–Oman.[116]

Valley exit jet

A valley exit jet is a strong, down-valley, elevated air current that emerges above the intersection of the valley and its adjacent plain. These winds frequently reach speeds of up to 20 m/s (72 km/h; 45 mph) at heights of 40–200 m (130–660 ft) above the ground. Surface winds below the jet tend to be substantially weaker, even when they are strong enough to sway vegetation.

Valley exit jets are likely to be found in valley regions that exhibit diurnal mountain wind systems, such as those of the dry mountain ranges of the US. Deep valleys that terminate abruptly at a plain are more impacted by these factors than are those that gradually become shallower as downvalley distance increases.[117]

Africa

There are several important low-level jets in Africa. Numerous low-level jets form in the Sahara, and are important for the raising of dust off the desert surface. This includes a low-level jet in Chad, which is responsible for dust emission from the Bodélé Depression,[118] the world's most important single source of dust emission. The Somali Jet, which forms off the East African coast is an important component of the global Hadley circulation,[119] and supplies water vapour to the Asian Monsoon.[120] Easterly low-level jets forming in valleys within the East African Rift System help account for the low rainfall in East Africa and support high rainfall in the Congo Basin rainforest.[121] The formation of the thermal low over northern Africa leads to a low-level westerly jet stream from June into October, which provides the moist inflow to the West African monsoon.[122]

While not technically a low-level jet, the mid-level African easterly jet (at 3000–4000 m above the surface) is also an important climate feature in Africa. It occurs during the northern hemisphere summer between 10°N and 20°N above in the Sahel region of West Africa.[123] It is considered to play a crucial role in the West African monsoon,[124] and helps form the tropical waves which move across the tropical Atlantic and eastern Pacific oceans during the warm season.[125]

Other planets

Jupiter's distinctive cloud bands

For other planets, internal heat rather than solar heating is believed to drive their jet streams. Jupiter's atmosphere has multiple jet streams caused by the convection cells driven by internal heating. These form the familiar banded color structure.[29]

See also

References


External links

<templatestyles src="Module:Side box/styles.css"></templatestyles><templatestyles src="Sister project/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Template:Magnetospherics Template:Earth's atmosphere

  1. jet stream | National Geographic Society.  (2021-02-24)  Retrieved 2023-07-03 from link
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Jet stream and stormy weather.  Kirsty McCabe.  (27 October 2022)  Royal Meteorological Society.  Retrieved 2 December 2024 from link
  3. 2024 Antarctic MERRA-2 Wind.  NASA.  Retrieved 2 December 2024 from link
  4. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  5. One Mystery of Jet Streams Explained.  (2008-10-17)  Retrieved 2023-07-03 from Space.com
  6. Sunny Intervals and Showers: our changing weather, p.142; Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London, 1992.
  7. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  8. See:
    1. Bishop, Sereno E. (17 January 1884) "Letters to the Editor: The remarkable sunsets," Nature, 29: 259–260; on page 260, Bishop speculates that a rapid current in the upper atmosphere was carrying the dust from the eruption of Krakatau westward around the equator.
    2. Bishop, S.E. (May 1884) "The equatorial smoke-stream from Krakatoa," The Hawaiian Monthly, vol. 1, no. 5, pages 106–110.
    3. Bishop, S.E. (29 January 1885) "Letters to the Editor: Krakatoa," Nature, vol. 31, pages 288–289.
    4. Rev. Sereno E. Bishop (1886) "The origin of the red glows," American Meteorological Journal, vol. 3, pages 127–136, 193–196; on pages 133–136, Bishop discusses the "equatorial smoke stream" that was produced by the eruption of Krakatau.
    5. Hamilton, Kevin (2012) "Sereno Bishop, Rollo Russell, Bishop's Ring and the discovery of the "Krakatoa easterlies"," Archived 22 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine Atmosphere-Ocean, vol. 50, no. 2, pages 169–175.
    6. Krakatoa Committee of the Royal Society [of London], The Eruption of Krakatoa and Subsequent Phenomena (London, England: Harrison and Sons, 1888). Evidence of an equatorial high-speed, high-altitude current (the quasi-biennial oscillation) is presented in the following sections:
    • Part IV., Section II. General list of dates of first appearance of all the optical phenomena. By the Hon. Rollo Russell., pages 263–312.
    • Part IV., Section III. (A). General geographic distribution of all the optical phenomena in space and time; including also velocity of translation of smoke stream. By the Hon. Rollo Russell., pages 312–326.
    • Part IV., Section III. (B). The connection between the propagation of the sky haze with its accompanying optical phenomena, and the general circulation of the atmosphere. By Mr. E. Douglas Archibald., pages 326–334; that Rev. S.E. Bishop of Honolulu first noticed a westward circulation of dust from Krakatau is acknowledged on page 333.
    • Part IV., Section III. (C). Spread of the phenomena round the world, with maps illustrative thereof. By the Hon. Rollo Russell., pages 334–339; after page 334 there are map inserts, showing the progressive spread, along the equator, of the dust from Krakatau.
  9. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  10. Ooishi, W. (1926) Raporto de la Aerologia Observatorio de Tateno (in Esperanto). Aerological Observatory Report 1, Central Meteorological Observatory, Japan, 213 pages.
  11. Pilot Weather Balloon (Pibal) Optical Theodolites.  (25 November 2009)  California State University Long Beach.  Retrieved 24 July 2023 from Martin Brenner's, Pilot Balloon Resources
  12. Wiley Post: First to Fly Solo Around the World, in the Winnie Mae.  Stephen Sherman.  (January 2001)  AcePilots.  Retrieved from link
  13. Seilkopf, H., Maritime meteorologie, which is volume II of: R. Habermehl, ed., Handbuch der Fliegenwetterkunde [Handbook of Aeronautical Meteorology] (Berlin, Germany: Gebrüder Radetzke [Radetzke Brothers], 1939); Seilkopf coins the word "Strahlströmung" on page 142 and discusses the jet stream on pages 142–150.
  14. Arbeiten zur allgemeinen Klimatologie by Hermann Flohn p. 47
  15. Weather Basics – Jet Streams.  Retrieved 8 May 2009 from link
  16. When the jet stream was the wind of war.  Retrieved 9 December 2018 from link
  17. Jet Stream.  Retrieved 4 May 2008 from link
  18. Jet Stream.  SKYbrary Aviation Safety.  Retrieved 2 December 2024 from link
  19. David R. Cook Jet Stream Behavior. Archived 2 June 2013 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  20. B. Geerts and E. Linacre. The Height of the Tropopause. Archived 27 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  21. National Weather Service JetStream. The Jet Stream. Archived 22 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  22. McDougal Littell. Paths of Polar and Subtropical Jet Streams. Archived 13 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 13 May 2008.
  23. Frequently Asked Questions About The Jet Stream.  NOVA.  Retrieved 24 October 2008 from PBS.org
  24. 24.0 24.1 24.2 Glossary of Meteorology. Jet Stream. Archived 1 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  25. The Jet Stream.  (20 September 2023)  NOAA.  Retrieved 2 December 2024 from link
  26. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  27. Glossary of Meteorology. Cyclone wave. Archived 26 October 2006 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 13 May 2008.
  28. Glossary of Meteorology. Short wave. Archived 9 June 2009 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 13 May 2008.
  29. 29.0 29.1 Robert Roy Britt. Jet Streams On Earth and Jupiter. Archived 24 July 2008 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 4 May 2008.
  30. Jet Streams On Earth and Jupiter. Archived 24 July 2008 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 4 May 2008.
  31. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  32. Blackburn, Mike; Hoskins, Brian; Slingo, Julia: Notes on the Meteorological Context of the UK Flooding in June and July 2007.  (25 July 2007)  Walker Institute for Climate System Research.  Retrieved 29 August 2007 from link
  33. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  34. 34.0 34.1 John P. Stimac. Air pressure and wind. Archived 27 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  35. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  36. Lyndon State College Meteorology. Jet Stream Formation – Subtropical Jet. Archived 27 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  37. 37.0 37.1 NOAA Overview of Hurricane Flossie.  Retrieved 14 June 2011 from link
  38. 38.0 38.1 Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  39. The Polar Jet Stream and Polar Vortex.  (21 May 2024)  Retrieved 2 December 2024 from MIT Climate Portal
  40. Ned Rozell. Amazing flying machines allow time travel. Archived 5 June 2008 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  41. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  42. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  43. North Atlantic Operations - Organised Track System.  SKYbrary Aviation Safety.  Retrieved 2 December 2024 from link
  44. BBC. Jet Streams in the UK. Archived 18 January 2008 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  45. M. P. de Villiers and J. van Heerden. Clear air turbulence over South Africa. Archived 15 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  46. Clark T. L., Hall W. D., Kerr R. M., Middleton D., Radke L., Ralph F. M., Neiman P. J., Levinson D. Origins of aircraft-damaging clear-air turbulence during the 9 December 1992 Colorado downslope windstorm : Numerical simulations and comparison with observations. Archived 27 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  47. National Transportation Safety Board. Aircraft Accident Investigation United Airlines flight 826, Pacific Ocean 28 December 1997. Archived 2 September 2009 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 13 May 2008.
  48. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  49. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  50. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  51. Keay Davidson. Scientists look high in the sky for power. Archived 7 June 2008 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  52. Archer, C. L. and Caldeira, K. Global assessment of high-altitude wind power, IEEE T. Energy Conver., 2, 307–319, 2009.[usurped] Retrieved on 24 October 2012.
  53. 53.0 53.1 L.M. Miller, F. Gans, & A. Kleidon Jet stream wind power as a renewable energy resource: little power, big impacts. Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss. 2. 201–212. 2011. Archived 18 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 16 January 201208.
  54. The Fire Balloons.  Retrieved 3 October 2009 from link
  55. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  56. Davide Zanchettin, Stewart W. Franks, Pietro Traverso, and Mario Tomasino. On ENSO impacts on European wintertime rainfalls and their modulation by the NAO and the Pacific multi-decadal variability described through the PDO index.[dead link] Retrieved on 13 May 2008.
  57. 57.0 57.1 Caio Augusto dos Santos Coelho and Térico Ambrizzi. 5A.4. Climatological Studies of the Influences of El Niño Southern Oscillation Events in the Precipitation Pattern Over South America During Austral Summer. Archived 30 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 13 May 2008.
  58. John Monteverdi and Jan Null. "WESTERN REGION TECHNICAL ATTACHMENT NO. 97-37 November 21, 1997: El Niño and California Precipitation." Archived 27 December 2009 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 28 February 2008.
  59. Climate Prediction Center. El Niño (ENSO) Related Rainfall Patterns Over the Tropical Pacific. Archived 28 May 2010 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 28 February 2008.
  60. 60.0 60.1 Climate Prediction Center. ENSO Impacts on United States Winter Precipitation and Temperature. Archived 12 April 2008 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 16 April 2008.
  61. Climate Prediction Center. Average October–December (3-month) Temperature Rankings During ENSO Events. Archived 30 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 16 April 2008.
  62. Climate Prediction Center. Average December–February (3-month) Temperature Rankings During ENSO Events. Archived 30 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 16 April 2008.
  63. How do El Niño and La Nina influence the Atlantic and Pacific hurricane seasons?.  Climate Prediction Center.  Retrieved 21 March 2008 from link
  64. Nathan Mantua. La Niña Impacts in the Pacific Northwest. Archived 22 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 29 February 2008.
  65. Southeast Climate Consortium. SECC Winter Climate Outlook. Archived 4 March 2008 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 29 February 2008.
  66. Reuters. La Nina could mean dry summer in Midwest and Plains. Archived 21 April 2008 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 29 February 2008.
  67. Paul Simons and Simon de Bruxelles. More rain and more floods as La Niña sweeps across the globe.[dead link] Retrieved on 13 May 2008.
  68. What Caused the U.S. Dust Bowl Drought of the 1930s?.  Rachelle Oblack.  Retrieved 2019-07-02 from ThoughtCo
  69. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  70. Jet stream found to be permanently drifting north.  (2008-04-18)  Associated Press.  Retrieved 7 October 2022 from link
  71. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  72. The Arctic is warming four times faster than the rest of the world.  (2021-12-14)  Retrieved 6 October 2022 from Science Magazine
  73. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  74. New data reveals extraordinary global heating in the Arctic.  (2022-06-15)  Retrieved 7 October 2022 from The Guardian
  75. 75.0 75.1 Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  76. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  77. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  78. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  79. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  80. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  81. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  82. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  83. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  84. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  85. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  86. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  87. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  88. Extreme global weather is 'the face of climate change' says leading scientist.  Retrieved 8 October 2022 from link
  89. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  90. The Arctic Is Getting Crazy.  Mark Fischetti.  Retrieved 8 October 2022 from link
  91. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  92. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  93. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  94. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  95. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  96. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  97. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  98. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  99. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  100. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  101. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  102. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  103. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  104. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  105. Landmark study casts doubt on controversial theory linking melting Arctic to severe winter weather.  (2021-05-12)  Retrieved 7 October 2022 from Science Magazine
  106. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  107. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  108. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  109. Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  110. Jet Streams around the World.  BBC.  Retrieved 26 September 2009 from link
  111. The Jet Stream.  Larry Gedney.  University of Alaska Fairbanks.  Retrieved 13 December 2018 from link
  112. 2002 Ozone-Hole Splitting – Background.  Ohio State University.  Retrieved from link
  113. J. D. Doyle. The influence of mesoscale orography on a coastal jet and rainband. Archived 6 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 25 December 2008.
  114. Matt Kumijan, Jeffry Evans, and Jared Guyer. The Relationship of the Great Plains Low-Level Jet to Nocturnal MCS Development. Archived 30 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  115. L. Qi, L.M. Leslie, and S.X. Zhao. Cut-off low pressure systems over southern Australia: climatology and case study. Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  116. 116.0 116.1 Lua error: bad argument #1 to "get" (not a valid title).
  117. Whiteman, C. David (2000). Mountain Meteorology, p. 193. Oxford University Press, New York. <templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>ISBN 978-0-19-803044-7, pp. 191–193.
  118. Washington, R., and Todd, M. C. (2005), Atmospheric controls on mineral dust emission from the Bodélé Depression, Chad: The role of the low level jet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L17701, doi:10.1029/2005GL023597.
  119. Heaviside, C. and Czaja, A. (2013), Deconstructing the Hadley cell heat transport. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc., 139: 2181-2189. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2085
  120. Boos, W.R. and Emanuel, K.A. (2009), Annual intensification of the Somali jet in a quasi-equilibrium framework: Observational composites. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc., 135: 319-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.388
  121. Munday, C., Savage, N., Jones, R.G. et al. Valley formation aridifies East Africa and elevates Congo Basin rainfall. Nature 615, 276–279 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05662-5
  122. B. Pu and K. H. Cook (2008). Dynamics of the Low-Level Westerly Jet Over West Africa. Archived 19 November 2017 at the Wayback Machine American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2008, abstract #A13A-0229. Retrieved on 8 March 2009.
  123. Dr. Alex DeCaria. Lesson 4 – Seasonal-mean Wind Fields. Archived 9 September 2013 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 3 May 2008.
  124. Kerry H. Cook. Generation of the African Easterly Jet and Its Role in Determining West African Precipitation. Archived 26 February 2020 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  125. Chris Landsea. AOML Frequently Asked Questions. Subject: A4) What is an easterly wave ? Archived 18 July 2006 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 May 2008.